Ad is loading...
APAAF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
GRSLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

APAAF vs GRSLF

Header iconAPAAF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts APAAF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
APPIA RARE EARTHS & URANIUM
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$107.51K
CapitalizationN/A
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$947.3K
CapitalizationN/A
APAAF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
APAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAAF vs. GRSLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAAF is a Hold and GRSLF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (APAAF: $0.06 vs. GRSLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: APAAF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APAAF: 79% vs. GRSLF: 277%
Market capitalization -- APAAF: $14.77M vs. GRSLF: $10.86M
APAAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.77M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APAAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than APAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APAAF is a better buy in the short-term than GRSLF.

Price Growth

APAAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APAAF($14.8M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($10.9M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 110.280 vs. APAAF (-68.009). APAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.88M vs. GRSLF (-19.73M). APAAF has more cash in the bank: 6.74M vs. GRSLF (1.49M). APAAF (0) and GRSLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APAAFGRSLFAPAAF / GRSLF
Capitalization14.8M10.9M136%
EBITDA-2.88M-19.73M15%
Gain YTD-68.009110.280-62%
P/E Ratio29.50N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.74M1.49M453%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APAAF vs GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
APAAF
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRSLF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as APAAF (72). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to APAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APAAF (100). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to APAAF’s over the last 12 months.

APAAF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (98). This means that APAAF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAAF (91). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAAF’s over the last 12 months.

APAAF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (100). This means that APAAF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APAAFGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCI18.580.57
+3.16%
Super Micro Computer
INUV0.20N/A
+0.30%
Inuvo
GRFS9.47-0.08
-0.84%
Grifols SA
LILA6.47-0.06
-0.92%
Liberty Latin America Ltd
MTRX12.52-0.30
-2.34%
Matrix Service Company

APAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APAAF and AMLI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APAAF and AMLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APAAF
1D Price
Change %
APAAF100%
+3.90%
AMLI - APAAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
NEXA - APAAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
TECK - APAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
GRSLF - APAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.27%
EMX - APAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
-9.27%
AAGFF - GRSLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
AGXPF - GRSLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.80%
FCX - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
TECK - GRSLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
EMX - GRSLF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
More