APGOF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.79M
HL
Price
$7.21
Change
+$1.11 (+18.17%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APGOF vs HL

Header iconAPGOF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts APGOF vs HLBanner chart's image
Apollo Silver
Price$0.28
Change-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Volume$68.97K
Capitalization15.79M
Hecla Mining
Price$7.21
Change+$1.11 (+18.17%)
Volume$443.75K
Capitalization3.01B
APGOF vs HL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APGOF vs. HL commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGOF is a Hold and HL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (APGOF: $0.28 vs. HL: $6.11)
Brand notoriety: APGOF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APGOF: 25% vs. HL: 97%
Market capitalization -- APGOF: $15.79M vs. HL: $3.01B
APGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.79M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APGOF and HL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than APGOF.

Price Growth

APGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.00% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than APGOF($15.8M). APGOF YTD gains are higher at: 82.927 vs. HL (24.619). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. APGOF (-9.21M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. APGOF (7.29M). APGOF has less debt than HL: APGOF (223K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than APGOF: HL (720M) vs APGOF (0).
APGOFHLAPGOF / HL
Capitalization15.8M3.01B1%
EBITDA-9.21M124M-7%
Gain YTD82.92724.619337%
P/E RatioN/A1111.11-
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash7.29M106M7%
Total Debt223K663M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL: Fundamental Ratings
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APGOFHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESHDF0.03N/A
N/A
Esprit Holdings Ltd.
JCYCF20.00N/A
N/A
Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited
MCHT7.75N/A
N/A
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial Corp.
PKCOF10.87N/A
N/A
Park 24 Corp.
CBTTF0.05N/A
-1.66%
Cathedra Bitcoin Inc

APGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APGOF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APGOF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APGOF
1D Price
Change %
APGOF100%
-1.19%
PAAS - APGOF
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
HL - APGOF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
WPM - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
BTG - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
AG - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More