APGOF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.79M
HWAUF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.96M
Ad is loading...

APGOF vs HWAUF

Header iconAPGOF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts APGOF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
Apollo Silver
Price$0.18
Change-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Volume$322.25K
Capitalization15.79M
Headwater Gold
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23K
Capitalization15.96M
APGOF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APGOF vs. HWAUF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGOF is a Hold and HWAUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (APGOF: $0.18 vs. HWAUF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: APGOF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APGOF: 235% vs. HWAUF: 90%
Market capitalization -- APGOF: $15.79M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
APGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.79M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APGOF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

APGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.59% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWAUF($16M) and APGOF($15.8M) have the same market capitalization . APGOF YTD gains are higher at: 15.533 vs. HWAUF (-13.333). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. APGOF (-9.21M). APGOF has more cash in the bank: 7.29M vs. HWAUF (3.96M). APGOF has less debt than HWAUF: APGOF (223K) vs HWAUF (323K). APGOF (0) and HWAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APGOFHWAUFAPGOF / HWAUF
Capitalization15.8M16M99%
EBITDA-9.21M-910.53K1,011%
Gain YTD15.533-13.333-116%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.29M3.96M184%
Total Debt223K323K69%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMPTX8.150.08
+0.99%
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opp P2
VYCCX25.11-0.28
-1.10%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 I
RNPAX59.59-0.73
-1.21%
American Funds New Perspective R1
JOHIX24.46-0.51
-2.04%
JOHCM International Select Institutional
LDVCX24.46-1.02
-4.00%
AXS FTSE Vntr Cptl RetTrckr C

APGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APGOF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APGOF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APGOF
1D Price
Change %
APGOF100%
-10.67%
PAAS - APGOF
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
HL - APGOF
49%
Loosely correlated
-7.28%
WPM - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
BTG - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
AG - APGOF
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+0.08%
SSVFF - HWAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-9.41%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.74%
APGOF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.67%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
DDEJF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More