Ad is loading...
APMRF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
HWNI
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APMRF vs HWNI

Header iconAPMRF vs HWNI Comparison
Open Charts APMRF vs HWNIBanner chart's image
Amper SA Madrid
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
High Wire Networks
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.29M
CapitalizationN/A
APMRF vs HWNI Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APMRF vs. HWNI commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APMRF is a Buy and HWNI is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (APMRF: $0.11 vs. HWNI: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: APMRF and HWNI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APMRF: 49% vs. HWNI: 1049%
Market capitalization -- APMRF: $169.25M vs. HWNI: $8.16M
APMRF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $169.25M. HWNI’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $8.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APMRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWNI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APMRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWNI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWNI is a better buy in the long-term than APMRF.

Price Growth

APMRF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HWNI (@Information Technology Services) price change was -8.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWNI is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-3.15% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APMRF($169M) has a higher market cap than HWNI($8.16M). APMRF YTD gains are higher at: -20.290 vs. HWNI (-49.778). APMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26.6M vs. HWNI (-11.01M). APMRF has more cash in the bank: 24.2M vs. HWNI (4.19M). HWNI has less debt than APMRF: HWNI (2.79M) vs APMRF (116M). APMRF has higher revenues than HWNI: APMRF (392M) vs HWNI (27.3M).
APMRFHWNIAPMRF / HWNI
Capitalization169M8.16M2,072%
EBITDA26.6M-11.01M-242%
Gain YTD-20.290-49.77841%
P/E Ratio791.96N/A-
Revenue392M27.3M1,436%
Total Cash24.2M4.19M578%
Total Debt116M2.79M4,165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWNI: Fundamental Ratings
HWNI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRPHX59.53-0.06
-0.10%
Permanent Portfolio Permanent C
MPLSX10.06-0.05
-0.49%
MassMutual Strat Emerg Mkts Adm
CNWIX19.38-0.19
-0.97%
Calamos Evolving World Growth I
CWIFX66.96-0.71
-1.05%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529F
PRECX21.39-0.33
-1.52%
PGIM Jennison Blend C

APMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APMRF and FWFW have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APMRF and FWFW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APMRF
1D Price
Change %
APMRF100%
N/A
FWFW - APMRF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - APMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
AUR - APMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
BBAI - APMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
FCCN - APMRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

HWNI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWNI and FCCN have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWNI and FCCN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWNI
1D Price
Change %
HWNI100%
+1.19%
FCCN - HWNI
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
BBAI - HWNI
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
KD - HWNI
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
ITFRF - HWNI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APMRF - HWNI
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More