It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
APPN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while MTLS (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
APPN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
MTLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APPN | MTLS | APPN / MTLS | |
Capitalization | 2.78B | 312M | 890% |
EBITDA | -80.9M | 26.7M | -303% |
Gain YTD | -6.320 | 13.481 | -47% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 44.70 | - |
Revenue | 545M | 254M | 215% |
Total Cash | 159M | 134M | 119% |
Total Debt | 277M | 66.2M | 418% |
APPN | MTLS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APPN's Valuation (68) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that APPN’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.
APPN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MTLS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that APPN’s stock grew similarly to MTLS’s over the last 12 months.
MTLS's SMR Rating (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
MTLS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as APPN (50) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
MTLS's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MTLS’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
APPN | MTLS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago90% | 3 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago82% | 11 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 5 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPN has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPN jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APPN | 100% | +2.23% | ||
CLSK - APPN | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
COIN - APPN | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
RIOT - APPN | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
PEGA - APPN | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
HOOD - APPN | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.76% | ||
More |