It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AQST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFCR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AQST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFCR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AQST (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while LFCR (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +4.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.20%.
AQST is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
LFCR is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
AQST | LFCR | AQST / LFCR | |
Capitalization | 383M | 177M | 216% |
EBITDA | 1.18M | -22.64M | -5% |
Gain YTD | 123.267 | 12.763 | 966% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 50.6M | 188M | 27% |
Total Cash | 23.9M | 4.22M | 566% |
Total Debt | 33.3M | 157M | 21% |
AQST | LFCR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AQST's Valuation (31) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFCR (92) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that AQST’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFCR’s over the last 12 months.
AQST's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as LFCR (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that AQST’s stock grew similarly to LFCR’s over the last 12 months.
LFCR's SMR Rating (98) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as AQST (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LFCR’s stock grew similarly to AQST’s over the last 12 months.
LFCR's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as AQST (38) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LFCR’s stock grew similarly to AQST’s over the last 12 months.
LFCR's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQST (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that LFCR’s stock grew significantly faster than AQST’s over the last 12 months.
AQST | LFCR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 5 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 3 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 8 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AQST and SUPN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQST and SUPN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AQST | 100% | -4.75% | ||
SUPN - AQST | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
ACET - AQST | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.49% | ||
CPHI - AQST | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
LFCR - AQST | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.68% | ||
OPTN - AQST | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.63% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFCR and SHPH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFCR and SHPH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFCR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFCR | 100% | -6.68% | ||
SHPH - LFCR | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
CRON - LFCR | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
CGC - LFCR | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
TLRY - LFCR | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
OGI - LFCR | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
More |