AQU vs ESHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQU is a Hold and ESHA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AQU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESHA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AQU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ESHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AQU’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESHA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AQU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- ESHA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
AQU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +10.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
AQU is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+2.31% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| AQU | ESHA | AQU / ESHA | |
| Capitalization | 49.4M | 152M | 33% |
| EBITDA | -966.58K | -391.76K | 247% |
| Gain YTD | 7.678 | 15.918 | 48% |
| P/E Ratio | 55.66 | 167.28 | 33% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 3.84K | 1.97M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 760K | N/A | - |
| AQU | ESHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 5% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 0% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 1% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NESIX | 20.03 | 0.22 | +1.11% |
| Needham Small Cap Growth Institutional | |||
| HCACX | 25.49 | 0.25 | +0.99% |
| Hartford Capital Appreciation C | |||
| GPAFX | 57.30 | 0.46 | +0.81% |
| Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A | |||
| ALABX | 12.39 | 0.08 | +0.65% |
| ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity A | |||
| IYBIX | 23.93 | 0.14 | +0.59% |
| Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund Class I | |||
AQU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQU has been loosely correlated with LATG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AQU jumps, then LATG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQU | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| LATG - AQU | 33% Loosely correlated | +3.68% | ||
| ESHA - AQU | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HYAC - AQU | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MARX - AQU | 23% Poorly correlated | -11.32% | ||
| GGAAF - AQU | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ESHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been closely correlated with LATG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then LATG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESHA | 100% | N/A | ||
| LATG - ESHA | 91% Closely correlated | +3.68% | ||
| MARXU - ESHA | 56% Loosely correlated | +15.29% | ||
| MARX - ESHA | 49% Loosely correlated | -11.32% | ||
| LATGU - ESHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| AQU - ESHA | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||