It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AREC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AREC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AREC (@Coal) experienced а -20.16% price change this week, while NC (@Coal) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.59%.
AREC is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
NC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
AREC | NC | AREC / NC | |
Capitalization | 110M | 226M | 49% |
EBITDA | 11.5M | -32.31M | -36% |
Gain YTD | -17.792 | 16.786 | -106% |
P/E Ratio | 10.17 | 13.60 | 75% |
Revenue | 21.4M | 215M | 10% |
Total Cash | 3.12M | 85.1M | 4% |
Total Debt | 57.2M | 44.7M | 128% |
AREC | NC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NC's Valuation (45) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AREC (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AREC’s over the last 12 months.
NC's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as AREC (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NC’s stock grew similarly to AREC’s over the last 12 months.
NC's SMR Rating (73) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as AREC (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NC’s stock grew similarly to AREC’s over the last 12 months.
AREC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NC (45) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that AREC’s stock grew similarly to NC’s over the last 12 months.
NC's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AREC (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AREC’s over the last 12 months.
AREC | NC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago85% | 25 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 4 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 4 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AREC and SXC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AREC and SXC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AREC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AREC | 100% | -8.76% | ||
SXC - AREC | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
NC - AREC | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
METC - AREC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
HNRG - AREC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
NRP - AREC | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NC has been loosely correlated with SXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NC jumps, then SXC could also see price increases.