Ad is loading...
ARGMX vs FNSFX
ARGMX vs FNSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARGMX vs. FNSFX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARGMX is a Hold and FNSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 6.12B vs. ARGMX (495M). ARGMX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: ARGMX (1.83) vs FNSFX (1.46). ARGMX was incepted earlier than FNSFX: ARGMX (10 years) vs FNSFX (8 years). ARGMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). ARGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FNSFX (13.00). FNSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARGMX: FNSFX (0) vs ARGMX (2500). FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. ARGMX (5.36). FNSFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.69 vs. ARGMX (41.49).
| ARGMX | FNSFX | ARGMX / FNSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.65 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.65 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 2.346 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 6.12B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.46 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.36 | 7.71 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.08 | 35.99 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.49 | 49.69 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...