Ad is loading...
ARGMX vs RFUTX
ARGMX vs RFUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARGMX vs. RFUTX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARGMX is a Hold and RFUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFUTX has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. ARGMX (495M). ARGMX pays higher dividends than RFUTX: ARGMX (1.83) vs RFUTX (1.17). ARGMX was incepted earlier than RFUTX: ARGMX (10 years) vs RFUTX (10 years). ARGMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RFUTX (0.39). ARGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RFUTX (5.00). RFUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARGMX: RFUTX (250) vs ARGMX (2500). RFUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. ARGMX (5.34). RFUTX return over 5 years is better than : 49.59 vs. ARGMX (42.22).
| ARGMX | RFUTX | ARGMX / RFUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.39 | 292% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.39 | 305% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.518 | 0.892 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 15.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.17 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 6.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.44 | 28.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.22 | 49.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.19 | - |