Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARLCX vs RHFTX
ARLCX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARLCX vs. RHFTX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARLCX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 50.5B vs. ARLCX (1.75B). RHFTX pays higher dividends than ARLCX: RHFTX (1.78) vs ARLCX (1.22). ARLCX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: ARLCX (15 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). ARLCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). ARLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARLCX: RHFTX (250) vs ARLCX (2500). RHFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. ARLCX (4.42). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 34.13 vs. ARLCX (11.62).
| ARLCX | RHFTX | ARLCX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.48 | 381% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.48 | 385% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.518 | 6.091 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 50.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.78 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | 9.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.45 | 21.59 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.62 | 34.13 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers