ARMC
Price
$0.02
Change
-$1.42 (-98.61%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
BMBLF
Price
$12.49
Change
-$0.06 (-0.48%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARMC vs BMBLF

Header iconARMC vs BMBLF Comparison
Open Charts ARMC vs BMBLFBanner chart's image
Asiarim
Price$0.02
Change-$1.42 (-98.61%)
Volume$590
CapitalizationN/A
Brambles
Price$12.49
Change-$0.06 (-0.48%)
Volume$244
CapitalizationN/A
ARMC vs BMBLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARMC vs. BMBLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARMC is a Hold and BMBLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ARMC: $0.02 vs. BMBLF: $12.49)
Brand notoriety: ARMC and BMBLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARMC: 100% vs. BMBLF: 18%
Market capitalization -- ARMC: $9.68M vs. BMBLF: $13.12B
ARMC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $9.68M. BMBLF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $13.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBMBLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BMBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMBLF is a better buy in the long-term than ARMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMBLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BMBLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ARMC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BMBLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.30% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBLF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than ARMC($9.68M). BMBLF YTD gains are higher at: 35.761 vs. ARMC (-98.951). BMBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. ARMC (-41.9K). BMBLF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. ARMC (0). ARMC has less debt than BMBLF: ARMC (18.9K) vs BMBLF (2.88B). BMBLF has higher revenues than ARMC: BMBLF (5.72B) vs ARMC (0).
ARMCBMBLFARMC / BMBLF
Capitalization9.68M13.1B0%
EBITDA-41.9K1.65B-0%
Gain YTD-98.95135.761-277%
P/E RatioN/A21.51-
Revenue05.72B-
Total Cash0158M-
Total Debt18.9K2.88B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARMC vs BMBLF: Fundamental Ratings
ARMC
BMBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMBLF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as ARMC (37). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to ARMC’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARMC (100). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARMC’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as ARMC (99). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew similarly to ARMC’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARMC (79). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARMC’s over the last 12 months.

BMBLF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARMC (100). This means that BMBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARMCBMBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BMBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BVEFX20.21-0.05
-0.25%
Becker Value Equity Retail
IHOFX18.85-0.07
-0.37%
Hartford International Opportunities F
VIEIX151.55-1.78
-1.16%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Instl
STSGX13.53-0.17
-1.24%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Inv
FAIRX30.36-0.45
-1.46%
Fairholme

ARMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARMC and JFIL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARMC and JFIL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARMC
1D Price
Change %
ARMC100%
N/A
JFIL - ARMC
22%
Poorly correlated
+61.09%
SPCB - ARMC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
BVRDF - ARMC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASAZF - ARMC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBLF - ARMC
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More

BMBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBLF and SECUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBLF and SECUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBLF
1D Price
Change %
BMBLF100%
-0.46%
SECUF - BMBLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
SCGPY - BMBLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-13.13%
EXPGF - BMBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GECSF - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.75%
BXBLY - BMBLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More