It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARSMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARSMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COPR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARSMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while COPR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -33.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.33%.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
ARSMF | COPR | ARSMF / COPR | |
Capitalization | 24.5M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | -6.47M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -14.903 | 49.400 | -30% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 171K | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 6.84M | N/A | - |
ARSMF | COPR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COPR's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as ARSMF (48). This means that COPR’s stock grew similarly to ARSMF’s over the last 12 months.
ARSMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as COPR (100). This means that ARSMF’s stock grew similarly to COPR’s over the last 12 months.
ARSMF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as COPR (100). This means that ARSMF’s stock grew similarly to COPR’s over the last 12 months.
COPR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ARSMF (42). This means that COPR’s stock grew similarly to ARSMF’s over the last 12 months.
COPR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ARSMF (100). This means that COPR’s stock grew similarly to ARSMF’s over the last 12 months.
ARSMF | COPR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MNOZX | 32.95 | N/A | N/A |
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z | |||
IASRX | 20.85 | -0.45 | -2.11% |
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund Cl R | |||
SOIVX | 34.23 | -0.92 | -2.62% |
Spirit of America Large Cap Value Inst | |||
AFALX | 11.54 | -0.32 | -2.70% |
Applied Finance Dividend Investor | |||
BGRFX | 88.38 | -2.99 | -3.27% |
Baron Growth Retail |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSMF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSMF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ARSMF | 100% | -2.30% | ||
MARIF - ARSMF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
SHERF - ARSMF | 25% Poorly correlated | -7.12% | ||
CAMZF - ARSMF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PILBF - ARSMF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
SGML - ARSMF | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that COPR and ARSMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COPR and ARSMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COPR | 100% | -33.60% | ||
ARSMF - COPR | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
LIFFF - COPR | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
NTMFF - COPR | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.97% | ||
ABAT - COPR | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
LZM - COPR | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
More |