Ad is loading...
ARSMX vs DFFVX
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs DFFVX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.04
Change-$0.43 (-4.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.64M
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$29.89
Change-$2.47 (-7.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.56B
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. DFFVX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a StrongBuy and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ARSMX (320M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: DFFVX (1.63) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: ARSMX (18 years) vs DFFVX (25 years). ARSMX (1.29) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSMX: DFFVX (0) vs ARSMX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.60 vs. ARSMX (-6.01). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 165.27 vs. ARSMX (89.34).
| ARSMX | DFFVX | ARSMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.29 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.601 | -5.436 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320M | 12.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.63 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.01 | 0.60 | -998% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.12 | 11.44 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.34 | 165.27 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.97 | 48.10 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers