Ad is loading...
ARSMX vs DFFVX
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs DFFVX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.18M
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$30.98
Change-$0.21 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.09B
ARSMX vs DFFVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. DFFVX commentary
May 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and DFFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. ARSMX (315M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: DFFVX (1.71) vs ARSMX (0.24). ARSMX was incepted earlier than DFFVX: ARSMX (18 years) vs DFFVX (25 years). ARSMX (1.29) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARSMX: DFFVX (0) vs ARSMX (2000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.98 vs. ARSMX (-3.83). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 115.30 vs. ARSMX (63.29).
| ARSMX | DFFVX | ARSMX / DFFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.29 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.642 | -9.469 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 12.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.71 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | -1.98 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.46 | 11.82 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.29 | 115.30 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.64 | 42.64 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers