ARSSF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
CRPLF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.03 (+4.48%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Capitalization
132.49M
Ad is loading...

ARSSF vs CRPLF

Header iconARSSF vs CRPLF Comparison
Open Charts ARSSF vs CRPLFBanner chart's image
Assura
Price$0.49
Change-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.81B
Capital & Regional
Price$0.70
Change+$0.03 (+4.48%)
Volume$300
Capitalization132.49M
ARSSF vs CRPLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARSSF vs. CRPLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSSF is a Hold and CRPLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ARSSF: $0.49 vs. CRPLF: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: ARSSF and CRPLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARSSF: 43% vs. CRPLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ARSSF: $1.81B vs. CRPLF: $132.49M
ARSSF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.81B. CRPLF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $132.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRPLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRPLF is a better buy in the long-term than ARSSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

ARSSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CRPLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARSSF($1.81B) has a higher market cap than CRPLF($132M). ARSSF has higher P/E ratio than CRPLF: ARSSF (13.64) vs CRPLF (3.12). ARSSF (0.000) and CRPLF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . CRPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40M vs. ARSSF (-92.4M). ARSSF has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. CRPLF (21.5M). CRPLF has less debt than ARSSF: CRPLF (262M) vs ARSSF (1.25B). ARSSF has higher revenues than CRPLF: ARSSF (150M) vs CRPLF (101M).
ARSSFCRPLFARSSF / CRPLF
Capitalization1.81B132M1,367%
EBITDA-92.4M40M-231%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio13.643.12438%
Revenue150M101M149%
Total Cash118M21.5M549%
Total Debt1.25B262M478%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRPLF: Fundamental Ratings
CRPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARSSFCRPLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCRTX51.080.74
+1.47%
Morgan Stanley Insight R6
BBMIX12.340.05
+0.41%
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap I
LMGTX55.040.14
+0.26%
ClearBridge International Growth C
GMVRX16.86N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value R
FSYCX9.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq C

ARSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSSF and STKAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSSF and STKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSSF
1D Price
Change %
ARSSF100%
N/A
STKAF - ARSSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+11.30%
MAPGF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTBIF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BSRTF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

CRPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRPLF has been loosely correlated with SQFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRPLF jumps, then SQFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRPLF
1D Price
Change %
CRPLF100%
N/A
SQFT - CRPLF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
MPCMF - CRPLF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARSSF - CRPLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLPR - CRPLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
JRHIF - CRPLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More