ARSSF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
STKAF
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.28 (+9.43%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
6.77B
Ad is loading...

ARSSF vs STKAF

Header iconARSSF vs STKAF Comparison
Open Charts ARSSF vs STKAFBanner chart's image
Assura
Price$0.55
Change+$0.12 (+27.91%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization1.81B
Stockland
Price$3.25
Change+$0.28 (+9.43%)
Volume$124
Capitalization6.77B
ARSSF vs STKAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARSSF vs. STKAF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSSF is a Hold and STKAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ARSSF: $0.55 vs. STKAF: $3.25)
Brand notoriety: ARSSF and STKAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARSSF: 315% vs. STKAF: 10%
Market capitalization -- ARSSF: $1.81B vs. STKAF: $6.77B
ARSSF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.81B. STKAF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARSSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STKAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARSSF is a better buy in the long-term than STKAF.

Price Growth

ARSSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +27.08% price change this week, while STKAF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +9.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.69% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STKAF($6.77B) has a higher market cap than ARSSF($1.81B). ARSSF has higher P/E ratio than STKAF: ARSSF (13.64) vs STKAF (10.95). ARSSF YTD gains are higher at: 11.813 vs. STKAF (4.334). STKAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. ARSSF (-92.4M). STKAF has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. ARSSF (118M). ARSSF has less debt than STKAF: ARSSF (1.25B) vs STKAF (4.47B). STKAF has higher revenues than ARSSF: STKAF (2.77B) vs ARSSF (150M).
ARSSFSTKAFARSSF / STKAF
Capitalization1.81B6.77B27%
EBITDA-92.4M1.04B-9%
Gain YTD11.8134.334273%
P/E Ratio13.6410.95125%
Revenue150M2.77B5%
Total Cash118M378M31%
Total Debt1.25B4.47B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STKAF: Fundamental Ratings
STKAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIGRX14.27-0.13
-0.90%
Putnam International Value C
JHLVX53.50-0.91
-1.67%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core C
PESPX28.09-0.69
-2.40%
BNY Mellon MidCap Index Inv
PQJCX14.14-0.37
-2.55%
PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity R6
TMCAX12.07-0.33
-2.66%
RBC SMID Cap Growth A

ARSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSSF and STKAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSSF and STKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSSF
1D Price
Change %
ARSSF100%
N/A
STKAF - ARSSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTBIF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSRTF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

STKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STKAF has been loosely correlated with INGEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STKAF jumps, then INGEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STKAF
1D Price
Change %
STKAF100%
N/A
INGEF - STKAF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRZCF - STKAF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAPGF - STKAF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTSGF - STKAF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WDPSF - STKAF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More