ARYMF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
299.32M
MJDLF
Price
$6.09
Change
+$0.08 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
595.69M
Ad is loading...

ARYMF vs MJDLF

Header iconARYMF vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts ARYMF vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
Argosy Minerals
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization299.32M
Major Drilling Group International
Price$6.09
Change+$0.08 (+1.33%)
Volume$9.37K
Capitalization595.69M
ARYMF vs MJDLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARYMF vs. MJDLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARYMF is a Hold and MJDLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ARYMF: $0.02 vs. MJDLF: $6.09)
Brand notoriety: ARYMF and MJDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARYMF: 137% vs. MJDLF: 210%
Market capitalization -- ARYMF: $299.32M vs. MJDLF: $595.69M
ARYMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $299.32M. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $595.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARYMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than ARYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARYMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARYMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than ARYMF.

Price Growth

ARYMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.64% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJDLF($596M) has a higher market cap than ARYMF($299M). ARYMF has higher P/E ratio than MJDLF: ARYMF (128.21) vs MJDLF (10.27). ARYMF YTD gains are higher at: 17.949 vs. MJDLF (7.597). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 146M vs. ARYMF (4.65M). MJDLF has more cash in the bank: 94.4M vs. ARYMF (23.1M). ARYMF has less debt than MJDLF: ARYMF (57K) vs MJDLF (25.6M). MJDLF has higher revenues than ARYMF: MJDLF (736M) vs ARYMF (218).
ARYMFMJDLFARYMF / MJDLF
Capitalization299M596M50%
EBITDA4.65M146M3%
Gain YTD17.9497.597236%
P/E Ratio128.2110.271,249%
Revenue218736M0%
Total Cash23.1M94.4M24%
Total Debt57K25.6M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARYMF vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
ARYMF
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9661
SMR RATING
1..100
7977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MJDLF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as ARYMF (91). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ARYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARYMF (96). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ARYMF (79). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ARYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as ARYMF (65). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to ARYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARYMF (97). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew significantly faster than ARYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARYMFMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREN1.400.14
+11.11%
Arena Group Holdings (The)
BILI17.470.49
+2.89%
Bilibili
RZLT4.870.11
+2.31%
Rezolute
CSGP73.850.43
+0.59%
CoStar Group
NRP107.22-0.35
-0.33%
Natural Resource Partners LP

ARYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARYMF and AOTVF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARYMF and AOTVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARYMF
1D Price
Change %
ARYMF100%
+5.61%
AOTVF - ARYMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
SEHKF - ARYMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MJDLF - ARYMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
LLKKF - ARYMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
MRRDF - ARYMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
+1.33%
FCX - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
HBM - MJDLF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
LUNMF - MJDLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
CSCCF - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SCCO - MJDLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More