It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARZTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARZTF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARZTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IMG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -22.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
ARZTF | IMG | ARZTF / IMG | |
Capitalization | 1.7B | 1.76M | 96,477% |
EBITDA | 244M | -9.07M | -2,691% |
Gain YTD | 5.866 | -75.079 | -8% |
P/E Ratio | 33.00 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.96B | 3.17M | 61,825% |
Total Cash | 186M | 3.28M | 5,671% |
Total Debt | 428M | 500K | 85,600% |
ARZTF | IMG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IMG's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as ARZTF (82). This means that IMG’s stock grew similarly to ARZTF’s over the last 12 months.
ARZTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100). This means that ARZTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.
ARZTF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as IMG (100). This means that ARZTF’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.
ARZTF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as IMG (63). This means that ARZTF’s stock grew similarly to IMG’s over the last 12 months.
ARZTF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMG (100). This means that ARZTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMG’s over the last 12 months.
ARZTF | IMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago23% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago22% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARZTF has been loosely correlated with SOSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARZTF jumps, then SOSCF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARZTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ARZTF | 100% | N/A | ||
SOSCF - ARZTF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
IMG - ARZTF | 23% Poorly correlated | -13.11% | ||
ASBFY - ARZTF | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
ARRT - ARZTF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SOWG - ARZTF | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that IMG and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMG and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMG | 100% | -13.11% | ||
JJSF - IMG | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
ARZTF - IMG | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BRCC - IMG | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
K - IMG | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
SMPL - IMG | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
More |