Ad is loading...
ASHR vs KALL
ASHR vs KALL Comparison
Open Charts ASHR vs KALL
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
Price$26.80
Change-$0.34 (-1.25%)
Volume$83.79K
CapitalizationN/A
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$20.74
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
Volume$118
CapitalizationN/A
ASHR vs KALL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASHR vs. KALL commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASHR is a Hold and KALL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASHR has more net assets: 2.87B vs. KALL (9.51M). KALL has a higher annual dividend yield than ASHR: KALL (16.832) vs ASHR (13.509). ASHR was incepted earlier than KALL: ASHR (11 years) vs KALL (10 years). ASHR has a higher turnover KALL (55.00) vs KALL (55.00).
| ASHR | KALL | ASHR / KALL | |
| Gain YTD | 13.509 | 16.832 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 2.87B | 9.51M | 30,170% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 55.00 | 125% |
| Yield | 2.47 | 3.41 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ASHR | KALL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | +1.38% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| TME - KALL | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||