ASM
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.08 (-8.08%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
CRDOF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ASM vs CRDOF

Header iconASM vs CRDOF Comparison
Open Charts ASM vs CRDOFBanner chart's image
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
Price$0.91
Change-$0.08 (-8.08%)
Volume$433
CapitalizationN/A
Cerrado Gold
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.61K
CapitalizationN/A
ASM vs CRDOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASM vs. CRDOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASM is a Buy and CRDOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ASM: $0.91 vs. CRDOF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: ASM and CRDOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASM: 87% vs. CRDOF: 11%
Market capitalization -- ASM: $98.38M vs. CRDOF: $58.98M
ASM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.38M. CRDOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $58.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRDOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRDOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASM and CRDOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRDOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CRDOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRDOF is a better buy in the short-term than ASM.

Price Growth

ASM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -21.80% price change this week, while CRDOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASM is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASM($98.4M) has a higher market cap than CRDOF($59M). ASM has higher P/E ratio than CRDOF: ASM (174.88) vs CRDOF (16.00). ASM YTD gains are higher at: 89.027 vs. CRDOF (-46.949). ASM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57M vs. CRDOF (1.98M). CRDOF has more cash in the bank: 18.6M vs. ASM (1.86M). ASM has less debt than CRDOF: ASM (3.54M) vs CRDOF (49.2M). CRDOF has higher revenues than ASM: CRDOF (90.5M) vs ASM (46M).
ASMCRDOFASM / CRDOF
Capitalization98.4M59M167%
EBITDA4.57M1.98M231%
Gain YTD89.027-46.949-190%
P/E Ratio174.8816.001,093%
Revenue46M90.5M51%
Total Cash1.86M18.6M10%
Total Debt3.54M49.2M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASM: Fundamental Ratings
ASM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMCRDOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMICY54.890.24
+0.43%
Trend Micro Inc.
GPOX0.04N/A
+0.36%
GPO PLUS INC.
SNMRY8.96-0.05
-0.55%
Snam S.p.A.
BASFY11.39-0.07
-0.61%
BASF SE
NGENF1.86-0.12
-5.87%
NervGen Pharma Corp.

ASM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASM has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASM jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASM
1D Price
Change %
ASM100%
-2.89%
PAAS - ASM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
HL - ASM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
CDE - ASM
67%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
MAG - ASM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
KGC - ASM
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More

CRDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDOF and VAUCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDOF and VAUCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRDOF
1D Price
Change %
CRDOF100%
-2.71%
VAUCF - CRDOF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.99%
ASM - CRDOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
HL - CRDOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
EXK - CRDOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
PAAS - CRDOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More