ASM
Price
$3.90
Change
-$0.08 (-2.02%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.38M
20 days until earnings call
GSVRF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
85.47M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASM vs GSVRF

Header iconASM vs GSVRF Comparison
Open Charts ASM vs GSVRFBanner chart's image
Avino Silver & Gold Mines
Price$3.90
Change-$0.08 (-2.02%)
Volume$57.11K
Capitalization98.38M
GUANAJUATO SILVER
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$410.2K
Capitalization85.47M
ASM vs GSVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASM vs. GSVRF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASM is a Hold and GSVRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ASM: $3.88 vs. GSVRF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: ASM and GSVRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASM: 94% vs. GSVRF: 62%
Market capitalization -- ASM: $98.38M vs. GSVRF: $85.47M
ASM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $98.38M. GSVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $85.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSVRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ASM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASM is a better buy in the long-term than GSVRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSVRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSVRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSVRF is a better buy in the short-term than ASM.

Price Growth

ASM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while GSVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

GSVRF is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASM($98.4M) has a higher market cap than GSVRF($85.5M). ASM YTD gains are higher at: 340.409 vs. GSVRF (104.344). ASM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57M vs. GSVRF (-15.3M). GSVRF has more cash in the bank: 5.28M vs. ASM (1.86M). ASM has less debt than GSVRF: ASM (3.54M) vs GSVRF (19M). GSVRF (47.6M) and ASM (46M) have equivalent revenues.
ASMGSVRFASM / GSVRF
Capitalization98.4M85.5M115%
EBITDA4.57M-15.3M-30%
Gain YTD340.409104.344326%
P/E Ratio174.88N/A-
Revenue46M47.6M97%
Total Cash1.86M5.28M35%
Total Debt3.54M19M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASM vs GSVRF: Fundamental Ratings
ASM
GSVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1475
SMR RATING
1..100
6599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSVRF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ASM (85) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GSVRF’s stock grew similarly to ASM’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSVRF (75) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSVRF (99) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GSVRF (36) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

ASM's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GSVRF (100) in the null industry. This means that ASM’s stock grew similarly to GSVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMGSVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBSEY6.390.13
+2.08%
BB Seguridade Participacoes SA
BCAUF0.39N/A
N/A
Brilliance China Automotive Holding Ltd.
PNBI27.00N/A
N/A
Pioneer Bankshares, Inc.
PBNAF17.75N/A
N/A
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
BCHPY5.20-0.18
-3.41%
Brainchip Holdings Ltd.

GSVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSVRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSVRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSVRF
1D Price
Change %
GSVRF100%
-0.39%
PAAS - GSVRF
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
HL - GSVRF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
MAG - GSVRF
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
CDE - GSVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
ASM - GSVRF
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
More