ASPZ
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
ESRCF
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.20 (-16.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

ASPZ vs ESRCF

Header iconASPZ vs ESRCF Comparison
Open Charts ASPZ vs ESRCFBanner chart's image
Asia Properties
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
ESR Cayman
Price$1.05
Change-$0.20 (-16.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
ASPZ vs ESRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ASPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASPZ vs. ESRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASPZ is a Hold and ESRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ASPZ: $0.04 vs. ESRCF: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: ASPZ and ESRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASPZ: 43% vs. ESRCF: 141%
Market capitalization -- ASPZ: $470.4K vs. ESRCF: $7.64B
ASPZ [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $470.4K. ESRCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASPZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASPZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESRCF is a better buy in the long-term than ASPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASPZ’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESRCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASPZ’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • ESRCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESRCF is a better buy in the short-term than ASPZ.

Price Growth

ASPZ (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +22.11% price change this week, while ESRCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.84% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESRCF($7.64B) has a higher market cap than ASPZ($470K). ASPZ YTD gains are higher at: 88.872 vs. ESRCF (-22.222). ESRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 670M vs. ASPZ (-109.49K). ESRCF has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. ASPZ (1.99K). ASPZ has less debt than ESRCF: ASPZ (58.3K) vs ESRCF (4.26B). ESRCF has higher revenues than ASPZ: ESRCF (404M) vs ASPZ (0).
ASPZESRCFASPZ / ESRCF
Capitalization470K7.64B0%
EBITDA-109.49K670M-0%
Gain YTD88.872-22.222-400%
P/E RatioN/A14.31-
Revenue0404M-
Total Cash1.99K1.52B0%
Total Debt58.3K4.26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASPZ: Fundamental Ratings
ASPZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASPZESRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ASPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGEMX25.08-0.54
-2.11%
George Putnam Balanced M
QDVCX12.39-0.32
-2.52%
EquityCompass Quality Dividend C
WLCAX13.21-0.35
-2.58%
Allspring Large Company Value A
LEICX24.37-0.68
-2.71%
Federated Hermes Equity Income C
OMGCX24.87-1.11
-4.27%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth C

ASPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASPZ and REAX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASPZ and REAX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASPZ
1D Price
Change %
ASPZ100%
+75.36%
REAX - ASPZ
10%
Poorly correlated
-6.63%
OPAD - ASPZ
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
CNGKY - ASPZ
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
ESRCF - ASPZ
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWWDF - ASPZ
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESRCF and CTRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESRCF and CTRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESRCF
1D Price
Change %
ESRCF100%
N/A
CTRGF - ESRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNGKY - ESRCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
COMP - ESRCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.45%
OPAD - ESRCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
ASPZ - ESRCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+75.36%
More