Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ATACX vs CRAZX
ATACX vs CRAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATACX vs. CRAZX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATACX is a Hold and CRAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. ATACX (48.4M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than ATACX: CRAZX (2.45) vs ATACX (0.85). ATACX was incepted earlier than CRAZX: ATACX (13 years) vs CRAZX (13 years). ATACX (2.46) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). ATACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 2155.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATACX: CRAZX (2000) vs ATACX (2500). ATACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. CRAZX (7.04). CRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 10.80 vs. ATACX (-16.61).
| ATACX | CRAZX | ATACX / CRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.81 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 0.81 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.944 | 4.512 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.4M | 2.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.45 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 7.04 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.47 | 20.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.61 | 10.80 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.98 | 23.95 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement