It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ATEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
ATEN | CYBR | ATEN / CYBR | |
Capitalization | 1.26B | 20.2B | 6% |
EBITDA | 59.3M | 58.8M | 101% |
Gain YTD | -4.794 | 19.994 | -24% |
P/E Ratio | 25.23 | 1272.70 | 2% |
Revenue | 267M | 1.2B | 22% |
Total Cash | 356M | 1.54B | 23% |
Total Debt | 228M | 1.22B | 19% |
ATEN | CYBR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ATEN's Valuation (19) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYBR (99) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew significantly faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ATEN (35) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to ATEN’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN's SMR Rating (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBR (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ATEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ATEN (56) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to ATEN’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ATEN (36) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to ATEN’s over the last 12 months.
ATEN | CYBR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago75% | 11 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 5 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATEN has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATEN jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ATEN | 100% | -2.41% | ||
PATH - ATEN | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
NTCT - ATEN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
FFIV - ATEN | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
CRM - ATEN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
CRWD - ATEN | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR | 100% | -0.71% | ||
CRWD - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
PANW - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
CVLT - CYBR | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
NOW - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More |