ATER
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.02 (+5.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LEG
Price
$9.80
Change
-$0.22 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATER vs LEG

ATER vs LEG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATER vs. LEG commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATER is a Hold and LEG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ATER: $0.41 vs. LEG: $9.80)
Brand notoriety: ATER and LEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATER: 60% vs. LEG: 64%
Market capitalization -- ATER: $4.45M vs. LEG: $1.34B
ATER [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $4.45M. LEG’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $27.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEG is a better buy in the long-term than ATER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATER’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LEG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEG is a better buy in the short-term than ATER.

Price Growth

ATER (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while LEG (@Home Furnishings) price change was -12.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+0.24% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEG($1.34B) has a higher market cap than ATER($4.45M). LEG YTD gains are higher at: -10.046 vs. ATER (-41.035). LEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 464M vs. ATER (-16.37M). ATER has less debt than LEG: ATER (2.9M) vs LEG (1.65B). LEG has higher revenues than ATER: LEG (3.95B) vs ATER (68.9M).
ATERLEGATER / LEG
Capitalization4.45M1.34B0%
EBITDA-16.37M464M-4%
Gain YTD-41.035-10.046408%
P/E RatioN/A6.09-
Revenue68.9M3.95B2%
Total Cash2.32MN/A-
Total Debt2.9M1.65B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATER vs LEG: Fundamental Ratings
ATER
LEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9663
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEG's Valuation (9) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (26) in the null industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

LEG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

LEG's SMR Rating (39) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATER (99) in the null industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATER’s over the last 12 months.

LEG's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATER (96) in the null industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATER’s over the last 12 months.

LEG's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that LEG’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATERLEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LEG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHDAX21.350.15
+0.71%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 A
HNDDX84.120.49
+0.59%
Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor
VITSX179.291.03
+0.58%
Vanguard Morn Total Stk Mkt Idx Instl
SCCVX16.460.05
+0.30%
AB Small Cap Value C
PGHAX73.86-0.52
-0.70%
Putnam Global Health Care R6

ATER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATER and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATER and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATER
1D Price
Change %
ATER100%
+5.15%
CRWS - ATER
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETD - ATER
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
LEG - ATER
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
VIRC - ATER
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
LZB - ATER
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
More

LEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEG has been loosely correlated with SGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEG jumps, then SGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEG
1D Price
Change %
LEG100%
-2.20%
SGI - LEG
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
ETD - LEG
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
MHK - LEG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
WHR - LEG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
LZB - LEG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
More