ATLC
Price
$102.31
Change
+$2.79 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.5B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$38.41
Change
+$1.05 (+2.81%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
343.92M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATLC vs RM

ATLC vs RM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATLC vs. RM commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATLC is a StrongBuy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ATLC: $99.52 vs. RM: $37.35)
Brand notoriety: ATLC and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATLC: 105% vs. RM: 91%
Market capitalization -- ATLC: $1.5B vs. RM: $343.92M
ATLC [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.5B. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $343.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $621.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $30.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ATLC and RM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATLC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than ATLC.

Price Growth

ATLC (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.69% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATLC is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

RM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.12% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATLC($1.51B) has a higher market cap than RM($344M). ATLC has higher P/E ratio than RM: ATLC (11.49) vs RM (7.58). ATLC YTD gains are higher at: 48.648 vs. RM (-1.915). RM has less debt than ATLC: RM (1.66B) vs ATLC (6.35B). RM has higher revenues than ATLC: RM (572M) vs ATLC (462M).
ATLCRMATLC / RM
Capitalization1.51B344M438%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.648-1.915-2,541%
P/E Ratio11.497.58152%
Revenue462M572M81%
Total CashN/A3.82M-
Total Debt6.35B1.66B383%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATLC vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
ATLC
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3831
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
1935
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATLC (80). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATLC’s over the last 12 months.

ATLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (100). This means that ATLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

ATLC's SMR Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (35). This means that ATLC’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

ATLC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (45). This means that ATLC’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

ATLC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (62). This means that ATLC’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATLCRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCIGX13.76N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Dividend Value
STFBX101.97N/A
N/A
State Farm Balanced
DEMRX73.94N/A
N/A
Nomura Emerging Markets R
PGJZX19.33N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Z
PPADX23.54N/A
N/A
GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value III

ATLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATLC has been loosely correlated with URI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATLC jumps, then URI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATLC
1D Price
Change %
ATLC100%
-0.60%
URI - ATLC
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
R - ATLC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
AER - ATLC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
RM - ATLC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
ALLY - ATLC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+0.40%
ALLY - RM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
COF - RM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
OMF - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
SYF - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
ATLC - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More