AU
Price
$46.45
Change
-$0.98 (-2.07%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.32B
58 days until earnings call
CHPGF
Price
$0.81
Change
-$0.01 (-1.22%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
86.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs CHPGF

Header iconAU vs CHPGF Comparison
Open Charts AU vs CHPGFBanner chart's image
AngloGold Ashanti
Price$46.45
Change-$0.98 (-2.07%)
Volume$19.79K
Capitalization9.32B
Chesapeake Gold
Price$0.81
Change-$0.01 (-1.22%)
Volume$42.42K
Capitalization86.4M
AU vs CHPGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AU vs. CHPGF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a StrongBuy and CHPGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AU: $46.44 vs. CHPGF: $0.81)
Brand notoriety: AU and CHPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 73% vs. CHPGF: 208%
Market capitalization -- AU: $9.32B vs. CHPGF: $86.4M
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.32B. CHPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $86.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHPGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than CHPGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.06% price change this week, while CHPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

CHPGF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($9.32B) has a higher market cap than CHPGF($86.4M). AU YTD gains are higher at: 106.168 vs. CHPGF (35.741). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 959M vs. CHPGF (-10.49M). AU has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. CHPGF (25.5M). CHPGF has less debt than AU: CHPGF (700K) vs AU (2.1B). AU has higher revenues than CHPGF: AU (4.53B) vs CHPGF (0).
AUCHPGFAU / CHPGF
Capitalization9.32B86.4M10,784%
EBITDA959M-10.49M-9,146%
Gain YTD106.16835.741297%
P/E Ratio221.70N/A-
Revenue4.53B0-
Total Cash312M25.5M1,224%
Total Debt2.1B700K299,429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs CHPGF: Fundamental Ratings
AU
CHPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CHPGF (27) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHPGF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CHPGF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CHPGF (49) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

AU's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CHPGF (100) in the null industry. This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to CHPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPMD53.270.66
+1.25%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF
BIBL40.130.29
+0.73%
Inspire 100 ETF
BBEM55.720.32
+0.58%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Mkt EqETF
GEMD40.180.16
+0.39%
Goldman Sachs Access Emrg Mkts USD BdETF
NVD15.94-0.94
-5.57%
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF

CHPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPGF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPGF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPGF
1D Price
Change %
CHPGF100%
-1.81%
GLGDF - CHPGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
IAUX - CHPGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+8.53%
AU - CHPGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+8.24%
FNLPF - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.21%
AEM - CHPGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.33%
More