It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePDLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDLB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.37% price change this week, while PDLB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.
AUB is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
PDLB is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
AUB | PDLB | AUB / PDLB | |
Capitalization | 3.12B | 205M | 1,520% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 12.445 | 34.119 | 36% |
P/E Ratio | 13.77 | 57.33 | 24% |
Revenue | 696M | 73.9M | 942% |
Total Cash | 197M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.11B | 717M | 155% |
AUB | PDLB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AUB's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PDLB (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PDLB’s over the last 12 months.
AUB's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.
AUB's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.
PDLB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (47) in the null industry. This means that PDLB’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.
AUB's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.
AUB | PDLB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago51% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago47% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago61% | 3 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 13 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JERNX | 11.70 | -0.03 | -0.26% |
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate N | |||
PFIEX | 11.76 | -0.04 | -0.34% |
Principal International Equity Index R6 | |||
FUEPX | 58.00 | -0.21 | -0.36% |
American Funds Europacific Growth 529F2 | |||
ASMMX | 29.98 | -0.29 | -0.96% |
Invesco Summit A | |||
AAWEX | 14.47 | -0.17 | -1.16% |
Cavanal Hill World Energy A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDLB has been closely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDLB jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PDLB | 100% | -1.28% | ||
RBCAA - PDLB | 66% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
BFC - PDLB | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
FCBC - PDLB | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
AUB - PDLB | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
FFBC - PDLB | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More |