AUCCF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
CDNMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUCCF vs CDNMF

Header iconAUCCF vs CDNMF Comparison
Open Charts AUCCF vs CDNMFBanner chart's image
IBERO MNG
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
EGR EXPL
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.33K
CapitalizationN/A
AUCCF vs CDNMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUCCF vs. CDNMF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUCCF is a Hold and CDNMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (AUCCF: $0.04 vs. CDNMF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: AUCCF and CDNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUCCF: 32% vs. CDNMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AUCCF: $980.1K vs. CDNMF: $1.03M
AUCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $980.1K. CDNMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CDNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNMF is a better buy in the long-term than AUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUCCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AUCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AUCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CDNMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNMF($1.03M) has a higher market cap than AUCCF($980K). AUCCF YTD gains are higher at: 18.000 vs. CDNMF (-6.667). CDNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -581.5K vs. AUCCF (-1.02M). AUCCF has more cash in the bank: 616K vs. CDNMF (510K). AUCCF (0) and CDNMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUCCFCDNMFAUCCF / CDNMF
Capitalization980K1.03M95%
EBITDA-1.02M-581.5K175%
Gain YTD18.000-6.667-270%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash616K510K121%
Total DebtN/A100K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUCCFCDNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGRTX15.110.15
+1.00%
Principal SmallCap Growth I Instl
OASGX11.970.10
+0.84%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A
WLCIX13.540.10
+0.74%
Allspring Large Company Value Inst
ACEIX10.520.07
+0.67%
Invesco Equity and Income A
WEEIX10.99N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Equity I

AUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUCCF and CDNMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUCCF and CDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUCCF
1D Price
Change %
AUCCF100%
N/A
CDNMF - AUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTZFF - AUCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - AUCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - AUCCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRTMF - AUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.43%
More

CDNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNMF has been closely correlated with ENDMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNMF jumps, then ENDMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNMF
1D Price
Change %
CDNMF100%
N/A
ENDMF - CDNMF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AUCCF - CDNMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHLL - CDNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
RGCCF - CDNMF
18%
Poorly correlated
+7.40%
GGAZF - CDNMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More