Ad is loading...
AUCCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
FTZFF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUCCF vs FTZFF

Header iconAUCCF vs FTZFF Comparison
Open Charts AUCCF vs FTZFFBanner chart's image
IBERO MNG
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.8K
CapitalizationN/A
FITZROY MINERALS
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
AUCCF vs FTZFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUCCF vs. FTZFF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUCCF is a Hold and FTZFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AUCCF: $0.04 vs. FTZFF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: AUCCF and FTZFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUCCF: 211% vs. FTZFF: 4%
Market capitalization -- AUCCF: $980.1K vs. FTZFF: $0
AUCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $980.1K. FTZFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTZFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUCCF and FTZFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AUCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FTZFF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTZFF YTD gains are higher at: 87.819 vs. AUCCF (46.267).
AUCCFFTZFFAUCCF / FTZFF
Capitalization980KN/A-
EBITDA-1.02MN/A-
Gain YTD46.26787.81953%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash616KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRCFX12.930.04
+0.31%
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate C
BMISX8.49-0.03
-0.35%
BNY Mellon Income Stock C
HWAZX42.16-0.25
-0.59%
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
HAVLX24.04-0.21
-0.87%
Harbor Large Cap Value Instl
BBGSX16.33-0.32
-1.92%
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth

AUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUCCF and CDNMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUCCF and CDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUCCF
1D Price
Change %
AUCCF100%
N/A
CDNMF - AUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTZFF - AUCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - AUCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - AUCCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMN - AUCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
More

FTZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTZFF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTZFF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTZFF
1D Price
Change %
FTZFF100%
N/A
AUCCF - FTZFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MMRGF - FTZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
AUMN - FTZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
SROYF - FTZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
STLRF - FTZFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More