Ad is loading...
AUCCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
MRIRF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUCCF vs MRIRF

Header iconAUCCF vs MRIRF Comparison
Open Charts AUCCF vs MRIRFBanner chart's image
IBERO MNG
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Route 109 Resources
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$650
CapitalizationN/A
AUCCF vs MRIRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUCCF vs. MRIRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUCCF is a Hold and MRIRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AUCCF: $0.04 vs. MRIRF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: AUCCF and MRIRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUCCF: 211% vs. MRIRF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AUCCF: $980.1K vs. MRIRF: $2.87M
AUCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $980.1K. MRIRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRIRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRIRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUCCF is a better buy in the long-term than MRIRF.

Price Growth

AUCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRIRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRIRF($2.87M) has a higher market cap than AUCCF($980K). MRIRF YTD gains are higher at: 56.129 vs. AUCCF (46.267). MRIRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -621.08K vs. AUCCF (-1.02M). MRIRF has more cash in the bank: 821K vs. AUCCF (616K). AUCCF (0) and MRIRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUCCFMRIRFAUCCF / MRIRF
Capitalization980K2.87M34%
EBITDA-1.02M-621.08K164%
Gain YTD46.26756.12982%
P/E RatioN/A4.61-
Revenue00-
Total Cash616K821K75%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIIEX21.70N/A
N/A
Brandes International Equity I
IJMAX15.93-0.03
-0.19%
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value A
VESIX34.54-0.16
-0.46%
Vanguard European Stock Instl
CWCFX18.15-0.13
-0.71%
Christopher Weil & Co Core Investment
FIKGX90.18-2.87
-3.08%
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Z

AUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUCCF and CDNMF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUCCF and CDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUCCF
1D Price
Change %
AUCCF100%
N/A
CDNMF - AUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTZFF - AUCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIRF - AUCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - AUCCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMN - AUCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
More

MRIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRIRF has been loosely correlated with TAJIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRIRF jumps, then TAJIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRIRF
1D Price
Change %
MRIRF100%
N/A
TAJIF - MRIRF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSTBF - MRIRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUCCF - MRIRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRGF - MRIRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A