Ad is loading...
AUEEF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
IPGDF
Price
$3.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUEEF vs IPGDF

Header iconAUEEF vs IPGDF Comparison
Open Charts AUEEF vs IPGDFBanner chart's image
Aura Energy
Price$0.06
Change-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Volume$50K
CapitalizationN/A
IGO
Price$3.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
AUEEF vs IPGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUEEF vs. IPGDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUEEF is a Hold and IPGDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AUEEF: $0.06 vs. IPGDF: $3.41)
Brand notoriety: AUEEF and IPGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUEEF: 163% vs. IPGDF: 41%
Market capitalization -- AUEEF: $86.22M vs. IPGDF: $7.18B
AUEEF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $86.22M. IPGDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUEEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPGDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUEEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the long-term than AUEEF.

Price Growth

AUEEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -27.91% price change this week, while IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPGDF($7.18B) has a higher market cap than AUEEF($86.2M). IPGDF YTD gains are higher at: -44.553 vs. AUEEF (-55.714). IPGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. AUEEF (-5.38M). IPGDF has more cash in the bank: 494M vs. AUEEF (6.2M). AUEEF has less debt than IPGDF: AUEEF (312K) vs IPGDF (947M). IPGDF has higher revenues than AUEEF: IPGDF (1.02B) vs AUEEF (0).
AUEEFIPGDFAUEEF / IPGDF
Capitalization86.2M7.18B1%
EBITDA-5.38M1.26B-0%
Gain YTD-55.714-44.553125%
P/E RatioN/A12.74-
Revenue01.02B-
Total Cash6.2M494M1%
Total Debt312K947M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUEEF vs IPGDF: Fundamental Ratings
AUEEF
IPGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPGDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as AUEEF (39). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to AUEEF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AUEEF (100). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to AUEEF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as AUEEF (92). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to AUEEF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as AUEEF (93). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to AUEEF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUEEF (100). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AUEEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEQLX37.89-0.21
-0.55%
Putnam Large Cap Value R5
MCSMX9.04-0.07
-0.77%
Matthews China Small Companies
LICOX15.35-0.13
-0.84%
Lord Abbett International Equity F3
VRSGX38.51-0.46
-1.18%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth R6
HGHAX37.52-1.03
-2.67%
Hartford Healthcare A

AUEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUEEF and BVLDF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUEEF and BVLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUEEF
1D Price
Change %
AUEEF100%
-31.11%
BVLDF - AUEEF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNIKF - AUEEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
IPGDF - AUEEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFUNF - AUEEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRUUF - AUEEF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
More

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with IIDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then IIDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
N/A
IIDDY - IPGDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MALRY - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.30%
PMETF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.22%
LYSDY - IPGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
RTNTF - IPGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
More