Ad is loading...
AUHIF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
XTGRF
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.01 (-0.89%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUHIF vs XTGRF

Header iconAUHIF vs XTGRF Comparison
Open Charts AUHIF vs XTGRFBanner chart's image
Advanced Gold Exploration
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.01K
CapitalizationN/A
Xtra-Gold Resources
Price$1.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.89%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
AUHIF vs XTGRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUHIF vs. XTGRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUHIF is a Hold and XTGRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AUHIF: $0.01 vs. XTGRF: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: AUHIF and XTGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUHIF: 100% vs. XTGRF: 20%
Market capitalization -- AUHIF: $1.11M vs. XTGRF: $29.78M
AUHIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.11M. XTGRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUHIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXTGRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AUHIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XTGRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XTGRF is a better buy in the long-term than AUHIF.

Price Growth

AUHIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XTGRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XTGRF($29.8M) has a higher market cap than AUHIF($1.12M). XTGRF YTD gains are higher at: 38.043 vs. AUHIF (-50.000). XTGRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.51M vs. AUHIF (-3.18M). XTGRF has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. AUHIF (227K). AUHIF (0) and XTGRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AUHIFXTGRFAUHIF / XTGRF
Capitalization1.12M29.8M4%
EBITDA-3.18M-1.51M211%
Gain YTD-50.00038.043-131%
P/E RatioN/A63.29-
Revenue00-
Total Cash227K10.5M2%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XTGRF: Fundamental Ratings
XTGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBRE98.320.21
+0.21%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
COMB19.750.01
+0.05%
GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF
GMET23.23-0.14
-0.58%
VanEck Green Metals ETF
IWP127.95-1.16
-0.90%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
REMX45.58-0.59
-1.28%
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF

AUHIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUHIF has been closely correlated with RNDXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUHIF jumps, then RNDXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUHIF
1D Price
Change %
AUHIF100%
N/A
RNDXF - AUHIF
94%
Closely correlated
N/A
ELMGF - AUHIF
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.73%
XTGRF - AUHIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
AMEGF - AUHIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
ETFLF - AUHIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-24.83%
More

XTGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XTGRF and AUHIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XTGRF and AUHIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XTGRF
1D Price
Change %
XTGRF100%
-0.89%
AUHIF - XTGRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - XTGRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGO - XTGRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
EQX - XTGRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
GOLD - XTGRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
More