AUMN
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
VLCJF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Aug 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

AUMN vs VLCJF

Header iconAUMN vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts AUMN vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
Golden Minerals
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$259.24K
CapitalizationN/A
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
AUMN vs VLCJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AUMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUMN vs. VLCJF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMN is a StrongBuy and VLCJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AUMN: $0.11 vs. VLCJF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: AUMN and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUMN: 101% vs. VLCJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AUMN: $6.12M vs. VLCJF: $13.79M
AUMN [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.12M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLCJF is a better buy in the long-term than AUMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AUMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AUMN (@Precious Metals) experienced а -51.54% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLCJF($13.8M) has a higher market cap than AUMN($6.12M). VLCJF YTD gains are higher at: 40.977 vs. AUMN (-78.842). VLCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.47M vs. AUMN (-8.59M). AUMN has more cash in the bank: 3.62M vs. VLCJF (1.85M). AUMN has less debt than VLCJF: AUMN (133K) vs VLCJF (237K). AUMN has higher revenues than VLCJF: AUMN (12M) vs VLCJF (0).
AUMNVLCJFAUMN / VLCJF
Capitalization6.12M13.8M44%
EBITDA-8.59M-2.47M348%
Gain YTD-78.84240.977-192%
P/E Ratio40.98N/A-
Revenue12M0-
Total Cash3.62M1.85M196%
Total Debt133K237K56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUMN vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
AUMN
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMN (80) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to AUMN’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMN (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to AUMN’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as AUMN (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to AUMN’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUMN (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that VLCJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUMN’s over the last 12 months.

AUMN's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as VLCJF (100) in the null industry. This means that AUMN’s stock grew similarly to VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMNVLCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AUMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMKTA68.330.15
+0.22%
Ingles Markets
BN59.01-0.14
-0.24%
Brookfield Corp
PII60.79-0.38
-0.62%
Polaris
IRIX1.68-0.03
-1.47%
IRIDEX Corp
FRGE0.96-0.07
-7.00%
Forge Global Holdings

AUMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUMN and VLCJF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUMN and VLCJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMN
1D Price
Change %
AUMN100%
-5.09%
VLCJF - AUMN
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPTF - AUMN
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
NEWP - AUMN
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
KNTNF - AUMN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
LGCFF - AUMN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and AUMN have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and AUMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
AUMN - VLCJF
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
CMCXF - VLCJF
24%
Poorly correlated
-12.79%
EGMCF - VLCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - VLCJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More