It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVAH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINNV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVAH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INNV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVAH (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while INNV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.
AVAH is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
INNV is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AVAH | INNV | AVAH / INNV | |
Capitalization | 504M | 639M | 79% |
EBITDA | 39.2M | -15.45M | -254% |
Gain YTD | 1.751 | -9.160 | -19% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.76 | - |
Revenue | 1.9B | 721M | 263% |
Total Cash | 43.9M | 98.8M | 44% |
Total Debt | 1.34B | 112M | 1,200% |
AVAH | INNV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago79% | 12 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago80% | 12 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago85% | 12 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago84% | 12 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago81% | 12 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago90% | 12 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago78% | 17 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago90% | 13 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago90% | 12 days ago88% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FTCHX | 63.94 | 0.85 | +1.35% |
Invesco Technology Investor | |||
FMDRX | 29.54 | 0.23 | +0.78% |
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6 | |||
LOFLX | 13.70 | 0.07 | +0.51% |
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3 | |||
WLTTX | 10.06 | 0.04 | +0.40% |
Wilshire International Equity Instl | |||
HSCYX | 29.88 | 0.11 | +0.37% |
Hartford Small Company Y |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAH has been loosely correlated with DCGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAH jumps, then DCGO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AVAH | 100% | -1.06% | ||
DCGO - AVAH | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
ENSG - AVAH | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
PNTG - AVAH | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
SEM - AVAH | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
NHC - AVAH | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INNV and BKD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INNV and BKD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INNV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INNV | 100% | -2.46% | ||
BKD - INNV | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
HCSG - INNV | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
SEM - INNV | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
UHS - INNV | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
AVAH - INNV | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
More |