It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVAH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINNV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVAH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INNV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVAH (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -10.15% price change this week, while INNV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -15.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.66%.
AVAH is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
INNV is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AVAH | INNV | AVAH / INNV | |
Capitalization | 504M | 639M | 79% |
EBITDA | 39.2M | -15.45M | -254% |
Gain YTD | 78.358 | -32.000 | -245% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.76 | - |
Revenue | 1.9B | 721M | 263% |
Total Cash | 43.9M | 98.8M | 44% |
Total Debt | 1.34B | 112M | 1,200% |
AVAH | INNV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago77% | 14 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
STCZX | 16.32 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6 | |||
STFAX | 457.68 | -1.77 | -0.39% |
State Street Equity 500 Index Adm | |||
TEQCX | 25.85 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
Touchstone Non-US ESG Equity C | |||
FIQVX | 37.40 | -0.25 | -0.66% |
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs Z | |||
ZSCIX | 38.31 | -0.57 | -1.47% |
Zacks Small-Cap Core Institutional |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAH has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAH jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AVAH | 100% | -3.82% | ||
ENSG - AVAH | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
PNTG - AVAH | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
SEM - AVAH | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
NHC - AVAH | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
ASTH - AVAH | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INNV and HCSG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INNV and HCSG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INNV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INNV | 100% | -7.27% | ||
HCSG - INNV | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.61% | ||
BKD - INNV | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AMN - INNV | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
AVAH - INNV | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
NHC - INNV | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More |