Advertisement
AVO vs PYPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVO is a Hold and PYPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AVO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PYPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AVO (@Food Distributors) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while PYPL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +145.49%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
AVO is expected to report earnings on Sep 15, 2025.
PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (-0.21% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.01% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| AVO | PYPL | AVO / PYPL | |
| Capitalization | 841M | 71.8B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 64.4M | 6.83B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -17.537 | -14.517 | 121% |
| P/E Ratio | 147.13 | 16.93 | 869% |
| Revenue | 999M | 29.8B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 39.9M | 14.1B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 257M | 9.68B | 3% |
PYPL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AVO | PYPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 13 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NUSA | 23.20 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF | |||
| TJUL | 28.60 | -0.11 | -0.38% |
| Innovator Eq Defnd Protd ETF2 Yr-Jul2027 | |||
| IYZ | 29.33 | -0.17 | -0.58% |
| iShares US Telecommunications ETF | |||
| IJS | 101.34 | -2.38 | -2.29% |
| iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | |||
| BEGS | 31.86 | -0.77 | -2.35% |
| Rareview 2X Bull Cryptoccy & Prc Mtl ETF | |||
AVO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVO has been loosely correlated with CVGW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVO jumps, then CVGW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVO | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| CVGW - AVO | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| SYY - AVO | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| SPTN - AVO | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| USFD - AVO | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| PFGC - AVO | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||
PYPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| SYF - PYPL | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| AXP - PYPL | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| COF - PYPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| AL - PYPL | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| MA - PYPL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||