AWR vs OMI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWR is a StrongBuy and OMI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AWR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AWR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- OMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
AWR (@Water Utilities) experienced а -1.59% price change this week, while OMI (@Medical Distributors) price change was +5.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
AWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
OMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (+0.94% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
@Medical Distributors (+5.72% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
| AWR | OMI | AWR / OMI | |
| Capitalization | 2.65B | 2.11B | 126% |
| EBITDA | 253M | 391M | 65% |
| Gain YTD | 2.264 | -47.513 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.33 | 64.10 | 33% |
| Revenue | 596M | 10.3B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 14.1M | 243M | 6% |
| Total Debt | 918M | 2.32B | 40% |
AWR | OMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMI's Valuation (50) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWR (89) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWR’s over the last 12 months.
AWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as OMI (100) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that AWR’s stock grew similarly to OMI’s over the last 12 months.
AWR's SMR Rating (57) in the Water Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMI (94) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that AWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMI’s over the last 12 months.
AWR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Water Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMI (94) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that AWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMI’s over the last 12 months.
OMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as AWR (25) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that OMI’s stock grew similarly to AWR’s over the last 12 months.
| AWR | OMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 7 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 4 days ago 78% |
OMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OMI and CAH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMI and CAH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMI | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| CAH - OMI | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| HSIC - OMI | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| ZYXI - OMI | 17% Poorly correlated | -6.85% | ||
| COR - OMI | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MCK - OMI | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||