It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AXP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFTAI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AXP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTAI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AXP (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while FTAI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.37%.
AXP is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
FTAI is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
AXP | FTAI | AXP / FTAI | |
Capitalization | 164B | 6.8B | 2,413% |
EBITDA | N/A | 559M | - |
Gain YTD | 63.923 | 182.685 | 35% |
P/E Ratio | 20.30 | 32.13 | 63% |
Revenue | 60.4B | 1.17B | 5,158% |
Total Cash | 5.08B | 90.8M | 5,591% |
Total Debt | 49.2B | 2.52B | 1,955% |
AXP | FTAI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTAI's Valuation (81) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AXP (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FTAI’s stock grew similarly to AXP’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FTAI (9) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew similarly to FTAI’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FTAI (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew significantly faster than FTAI’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FTAI (41) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew similarly to FTAI’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FTAI (52) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew similarly to FTAI’s over the last 12 months.
AXP | FTAI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 5 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago60% | 7 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXP has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AXP jumps, then COF could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTAI has been loosely correlated with AER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTAI jumps, then AER could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTAI | 100% | +1.05% | ||
AER - FTAI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
AL - FTAI | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
BBDC - FTAI | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
NAVI - FTAI | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
ENVA - FTAI | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
More |