Ad is loading...
AZASF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
HL
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AZASF vs HL

Header iconAZASF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts AZASF vs HLBanner chart's image
Arizona Gold & Silver
Price$0.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$5.50
Change-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Volume$31.11M
CapitalizationN/A
AZASF vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZASF vs. HL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZASF is a Hold and HL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AZASF: $0.31 vs. HL: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: AZASF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZASF: 15% vs. HL: 246%
Market capitalization -- AZASF: $22.09M vs. HL: $3.01B
AZASF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.09M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than AZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

AZASF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.41% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than AZASF($22.1M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 14.897 vs. AZASF (-5.372). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. AZASF (-1.48M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. AZASF (135K). AZASF has less debt than HL: AZASF (100K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than AZASF: HL (720M) vs AZASF (0).
AZASFHLAZASF / HL
Capitalization22.1M3.01B1%
EBITDA-1.48M124M-1%
Gain YTD-5.37214.897-36%
P/E RatioN/A1111.11-
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash135K106M0%
Total Debt100K663M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZASF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
AZASF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5749
SMR RATING
1..100
9587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZASF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (57) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (95) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

AZASF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZASF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIZAX12.710.10
+0.79%
Invesco Global Infrastructure A
IVOYX20.62-0.15
-0.72%
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Income Opps Y
MRGSX24.54-0.22
-0.89%
BlackRock Advantage Global R
CWIAX66.94-0.71
-1.05%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529A
FIVFX28.70-0.31
-1.07%
Fidelity International Capital Apprec

AZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZASF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZASF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZASF
1D Price
Change %
AZASF100%
-0.96%
SAND - AZASF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
HL - AZASF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
SSRM - AZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEM - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
EGO - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More