AZASF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
22.09M
PDIYF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
227.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZASF vs PDIYF

Header iconAZASF vs PDIYF Comparison
Open Charts AZASF vs PDIYFBanner chart's image
Arizona Gold & Silver
Price$0.24
Change-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Volume$173.75K
Capitalization22.09M
Predictive Discovery
Price$0.25
Change-$0.03 (-10.71%)
Volume$153.5K
Capitalization227.18M
AZASF vs PDIYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZASF vs. PDIYF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZASF is a Hold and PDIYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AZASF: $0.23 vs. PDIYF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: AZASF and PDIYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZASF: 26% vs. PDIYF: 263%
Market capitalization -- AZASF: $22.09M vs. PDIYF: $227.18M
AZASF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.09M. PDIYF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $227.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePDIYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PDIYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZASF is a better buy in the long-term than PDIYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZASF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDIYF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZASF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PDIYF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZASF is a better buy in the short-term than PDIYF.

Price Growth

AZASF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.13% price change this week, while PDIYF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDIYF($227M) has a higher market cap than AZASF($22.1M). PDIYF YTD gains are higher at: 69.090 vs. AZASF (-31.718). AZASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.48M vs. PDIYF (-13.58M). PDIYF has more cash in the bank: 8.64M vs. AZASF (135K).
AZASFPDIYFAZASF / PDIYF
Capitalization22.1M227M10%
EBITDA-1.48M-13.58M11%
Gain YTD-31.71869.090-46%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash135K8.64M2%
Total Debt100KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZASF: Fundamental Ratings
AZASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZASFPDIYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PDIYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIGCX31.62N/A
N/A
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr C
JIVRX31.70N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R5
QLSCX27.05N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
FIQDX8.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret Z
VKSDX10.48N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value A

AZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZASF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZASF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZASF
1D Price
Change %
AZASF100%
-3.12%
SAND - AZASF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
HL - AZASF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
SSRM - AZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NEM - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
EGO - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More

PDIYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PDIYF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PDIYF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDIYF
1D Price
Change %
PDIYF100%
N/A
PUCCF - PDIYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZASF - PDIYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
ZPHYF - PDIYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADYRF - PDIYF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - PDIYF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More