BAC
Price
$61.73
Change
+$0.66 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
433.22B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
C
Price
$132.32
Change
+$5.19 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
221.95B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs C

BAC vs C Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank of America (BAC) vs. Citigroup (C) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAC and C are two of America's "Big Four" banking institutions, yet their recent stock trajectories and strategic narratives have diverged markedly.
  • Bank of America delivered steady, broad-based growth in 2025, with net income rising 13% to $30.5 billion and full-year revenue reaching $113.1 billion, supported by a diversified domestic franchise and disciplined expense management.
  • Citigroup posted a spectacular 2025 share-price surge of roughly 60%, outpacing all major peers, driven by CEO Jane Fraser's aggressive restructuring program and tangible progress on long-awaited divestitures and efficiency gains.
  • On valuation, C trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple below both the industry average and BAC, but carries higher execution risk tied to its ongoing transformation.
  • Both banks benefit from Federal Reserve rate-cut tailwinds and a recovering investment banking environment, though their risk profiles, return metrics, and growth catalysts differ meaningfully.

Introduction

Investors evaluating large-cap U.S. financial stocks frequently find themselves comparing BAC (Bank of America) and C (Citigroup). Both are globally systemically important banks with trillion-dollar balance sheets, massive deposit bases, and deep ties to the health of the American and global economy. Yet beneath the surface, these two institutions are navigating distinctly different chapters. Bank of America is focused on steady, organic expansion and operational efficiency, while Citigroup is in the midst of one of the most ambitious turnarounds in modern banking. This comparison examines how each stock is positioned in the current market environment, drawing on recent financial data, strategic developments, and relative performance metrics to help traders and investors assess the trade-offs.

BAC Overview and Recent Performance

Bank of America is the second-largest U.S. bank by market capitalization and operates a highly diversified franchise spanning consumer banking, wealth management, global banking, and global markets. For full-year 2025, the company reported net income of $30.5 billion, a 13% year-over-year increase, on revenue of $113.1 billion, which grew 7%. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) rose 19% to $3.81. The bank posted a return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) — a key profitability gauge that measures income generated relative to tangible equity capital — of 14.2% for the year.

In recent weeks, Bank of America shares have remained supported by consistent execution and a favorable macroeconomic backdrop. The company projects net interest income (NII) — the spread between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits — to grow 5% to 7% in 2026, aided by asset repricing, mid-single-digit loan growth, and disciplined deposit pricing. The bank's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio, which measures a bank's core capital against its risk-weighted assets, stood at 11.5%, comfortably above regulatory minimums. Management has signaled confidence through an 8% dividend increase and a $40 billion share repurchase authorization. Technology investment, running at roughly $13 billion annually, continues to underpin productivity gains, including AI-driven coding efficiencies and customer-service automation through its Erica virtual assistant, now serving more than 20 million clients.

C Overview and Recent Performance

Citigroup, once the perennial underperformer among the Big Four U.S. banks, delivered a standout 2025, with its stock surging approximately 60% — far outpacing peers and many of the "Magnificent Seven" technology stocks. Full-year 2025 net income reached $14.3 billion (or $16.1 billion excluding notable items tied to its Russia exit and a Banamex goodwill impairment), up 13% on a reported basis. Revenue totaled $85.2 billion, a 6% increase year over year. All five of Citi's interconnected businesses — Services, Markets, Banking, Wealth, and U.S. Personal Banking (USPB) — posted positive operating leverage and record performances in at least one quarter.

The rally reflects tangible progress on CEO Jane Fraser's multi-year restructuring, internally codenamed "Project Bora Bora." Management layers have been compressed from 13 to 8, and roughly 20,000 positions — about 8% of the global workforce — have been eliminated. In December 2025, Citi completed the sale of a 25% equity stake in its Banamex unit, clearing a path toward a full initial public offering (IPO) of its Mexican consumer business in 2026. The bank's CET1 ratio stood at 13.2%, 160 basis points above its regulatory requirement. Citi returned over $17 billion to shareholders in 2025, including $13 billion in share buybacks. Management has set a target of 10%–11% ROTCE for 2026, up from 7.7% in 2025, reflecting confidence that efficiency gains and revenue momentum will continue compounding.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where interest rate expectations, regulatory shifts, and macroeconomic data can move bank stocks sharply, many traders are turning to AI-driven tools for a systematic edge. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of hundreds of AI trading bots, each designed with distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Only the bots best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a spot in this trending section. Performance among Tickeron's top AI robots has ranged from annualized returns of approximately 60% to over 290%, depending on strategy, timeframe, and asset class. Some bots operate on 5-minute or 15-minute intervals for active traders, while others scan 60-minute or longer horizons for swing and position traders. Each bot trades a defined set of tickers — which may include large-cap financials — and utilizes proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) that integrate technical analysis with pattern recognition. To explore which AI-driven strategies are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model and Revenue Mix. Bank of America generates the majority of its revenue from its dominant U.S. consumer and wealth management franchises, complemented by a strong global banking and markets operation. Citigroup, by contrast, is far more globally oriented — its Services segment (treasury, trade solutions, and securities services) is a distinct competitive moat, and its Markets and cross-border Banking units are larger relative to the overall franchise. Citi's U.S. consumer footprint, while significant, is smaller and less deeply embedded than BAC's nationwide retail network of roughly 3,650 financial centers serving 59 million verified digital users.

Growth Drivers. BAC's growth narrative is anchored in organic expansion — new financial center openings, deposit gathering, digital engagement, and mid-single-digit loan growth. Citi's growth story is more transformational, driven by restructuring tailwinds, a recovering investment banking cycle, wealth management scaling, and the planned Banamex IPO. Citi's investment banking fees rose 35% year over year in the fourth quarter of 2025, while BAC's IB business, though robust, grew at a more measured pace.

Profitability and Efficiency. Bank of America holds a clear lead on return metrics: its 2025 ROTCE of 14.2% nearly doubles Citi's 7.7% (or 8.8% excluding notable items). BAC's efficiency ratio — operating expenses divided by revenue — was 62% for 2025, compared with Citi's 64.7%. However, the gap is narrowing: Citi management expects the efficiency ratio to improve to roughly 60% in 2026 as cost-savings programs mature.

Valuation. Citi trades at a forward P/E of roughly 11.2 times earnings, a discount to BAC's approximately 12.6 times and the broader industry average near 15 times. On a price-to-tangible-book (P/TB) basis, Citi's 1.27 times also trails BAC's 2.01 times. This valuation gap reflects lingering skepticism about Citi's ability to sustain its recent momentum and close the profitability gap with peers.

Risk Factors. Both banks face credit quality uncertainties tied to the macroeconomic outlook, including the impact of tariffs on inflation and borrower health. BAC's asset quality metrics — specifically net charge-offs (NCOs), which represent loans the bank does not expect to recover — and provisions for credit losses have trended higher in recent quarters. Citi, while also managing credit risk, carries additional execution risk: its ambitious 2026 ROTCE target depends on continued cost discipline, successful divestitures, and sustained capital markets activity. Citi's non-accrual loans rose 35% year over year as of Q4 2025, warranting close monitoring.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability of earnings, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor BAC for investors prioritizing consistency, profitability, and lower execution risk. Bank of America's diversified domestic franchise, industry-leading efficiency metrics, robust capital return program, and clear medium-term NII growth targets create a more predictable return profile. That said, C presents a compelling case for investors willing to accept higher volatility in exchange for potentially greater upside, given its discount valuation, transformational momentum, and the possibility that its ROTCE converges toward peer levels over the next 12 to 24 months. The AI verdict is probabilistic: BAC scores higher on stability and current profitability, while C ranks favorably on momentum and valuation-driven opportunity. The final choice depends on an investor's risk tolerance and time horizon — dimensions that Tickeron's AI robots are designed to navigate with systematic discipline.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAC vs. C commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and C is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $61.73 vs. C: $132.32)
Brand notoriety: BAC and C are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 67% vs. C: 77%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $433.22B vs. C: $221.95B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $433.22B. C’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $221.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $932.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $211.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • C’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and C are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while C’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • C’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while C (@Major Banks) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.

C is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($433B) has a higher market cap than C($222B). C (14.26) and BAC (14.26) have similar P/E ratio . C YTD gains are higher at: 14.525 vs. BAC (13.457). BAC has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. C (23.7B). C (380B) and BAC (384B) have identical debt. BAC has higher revenues than C: BAC (115B) vs C (88.3B).
BACCBAC / C
Capitalization433B222B195%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.45714.52593%
P/E Ratio14.2614.26100%
Revenue115B88.3B130%
Total Cash27.1B23.7B114%
Total Debt384B380B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs C: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
C
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4114
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAC (66) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAC (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BAC (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as C (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to C’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADGZX27.16N/A
N/A
AB Core Opportunities Z
BAFSX44.59N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
FIQGX22.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerg Mkts Discv Z
QDISX20.48N/A
N/A
FI Instl Group Stock for Ret Plns
ANONX25.90N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth I

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+1.08%
WFC - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
JPM - BAC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
C - BAC
74%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
BCS - BAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.33%
More