Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEWBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EWBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while EWBC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.91%.
BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2023.
EWBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2023.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BAC | EWBC | BAC / EWBC | |
Capitalization | 227B | 7.66B | 2,965% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -11.818 | -16.844 | 70% |
P/E Ratio | 8.23 | 6.05 | 136% |
Revenue | 100B | 2.57B | 3,894% |
Total Cash | 29.7B | 760M | 3,908% |
Total Debt | 327B | 4.76B | 6,865% |
BAC | EWBC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAC's Valuation (82) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EWBC (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to EWBC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC | EWBC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago63% | 24 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago69% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago61% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LTO.X | 0.063300 | 0.005903 | +10.29% |
LTO Network cryptocurrency | |||
MANA.X | 0.299556 | 0.000849 | +0.28% |
Decentraland cryptocurrency | |||
ONT.X | 0.170062 | 0.000331 | +0.20% |
Ontology cryptocurrency | |||
REQ.X | 0.063665 | 0.000015 | +0.02% |
Request cryptocurrency | |||
BTCUP.X | 5.028114 | -0.030517 | -0.60% |
BTCUP cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWBC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWBC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EWBC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
WFC - EWBC | 72% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
BAC - EWBC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
NTB - EWBC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
C - EWBC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
BMO - EWBC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More |