BACA
Price
$10.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
IRRXU
Price
$10.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

BACA vs IRRXU

Header iconBACA vs IRRXU Comparison
Open Charts BACA vs IRRXUBanner chart's image
Berenson Acquisition
Price$10.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.41K
CapitalizationN/A
Integrated Rail and Resources Acquisition
Price$10.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BACA vs IRRXU Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
BACA vs. IRRXU commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACA is a Sell and IRRXU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BACA: $10.64 vs. IRRXU: $10.11)
Brand notoriety: BACA and IRRXU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BACA: 176% vs. IRRXU: 100%
Market capitalization -- BACA: $82.13M vs. IRRXU: $0
BACA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $82.13M. IRRXU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BACA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRRXU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BACA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IRRXU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BACA and IRRXU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BACA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IRRXU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BACA is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2023.

IRRXU is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BACA YTD gains are higher at: 3.805 vs. IRRXU (-7.077).
BACAIRRXUBACA / IRRXU
Capitalization82.1MN/A-
EBITDA-1.97MN/A-
Gain YTD3.805-7.077-54%
P/E Ratio60.94N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash14.4KN/A-
Total Debt15KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BACA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BACA has been loosely correlated with IGTAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BACA jumps, then IGTAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACA
1D Price
Change %
BACA100%
N/A
IGTAU - BACA
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTMA - BACA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
PWUP - BACA
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
FIAC - BACA
34%
Loosely correlated
-10.40%
NPAB - BACA
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IRRXU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRRXU has been loosely correlated with CBLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IRRXU jumps, then CBLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRRXU
1D Price
Change %
IRRXU100%
N/A
CBLO - IRRXU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BACA - IRRXU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBRGU - IRRXU
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHGC - IRRXU
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCAAU - IRRXU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More