BADEF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.98M
HL
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.17 (+2.92%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BADEF vs HL

Header iconBADEF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts BADEF vs HLBanner chart's image
HERCULES METALS
Price$0.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.31K
Capitalization30.98M
Hecla Mining
Price$6.00
Change+$0.17 (+2.92%)
Volume$173.43K
Capitalization3.01B
BADEF vs HL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BADEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BADEF vs. HL commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BADEF is a Hold and HL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BADEF: $0.47 vs. HL: $5.83)
Brand notoriety: BADEF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BADEF: 19% vs. HL: 92%
Market capitalization -- BADEF: $30.98M vs. HL: $3.01B
BADEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $30.98M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BADEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BADEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than BADEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BADEF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BADEF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BADEF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

BADEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.98% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than BADEF($31M). HL has higher P/E ratio than BADEF: HL (1111.11) vs BADEF (4.74). HL (18.908) and BADEF (18.519) have similar YTD gains . HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. BADEF (-3.12M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. BADEF (2.32M). HL has higher revenues than BADEF: HL (720M) vs BADEF (0).
BADEFHLBADEF / HL
Capitalization31M3.01B1%
EBITDA-3.12M124M-3%
Gain YTD18.51918.90898%
P/E Ratio4.741111.110%
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash2.32M106M2%
Total DebtN/A663M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL: Fundamental Ratings
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BADEFHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BADEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCSCX19.70N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value C
ASMOX19.62N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style I
BRWUX26.03N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R4
LRMAX24.15N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F3
NULV41.27-0.25
-0.60%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

BADEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BADEF and WRRZF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BADEF and WRRZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BADEF
1D Price
Change %
BADEF100%
-1.73%
WRRZF - BADEF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HL - BADEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
IMPUY - BADEF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
TFPM - BADEF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
PAAS - BADEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More