BADEF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
WRRZF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

BADEF vs WRRZF

Header iconBADEF vs WRRZF Comparison
Open Charts BADEF vs WRRZFBanner chart's image
HERCULES METALS
Price$0.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$274.23K
CapitalizationN/A
WALKER RIV RES
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BADEF vs WRRZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BADEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BADEF vs. WRRZF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BADEF is a StrongSell and WRRZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BADEF: $0.43 vs. WRRZF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: BADEF and WRRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BADEF: 49% vs. WRRZF: 143%
Market capitalization -- BADEF: $30.98M vs. WRRZF: $4.43M
BADEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $30.98M. WRRZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BADEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRRZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BADEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRRZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WRRZF is a better buy in the long-term than BADEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BADEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BADEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BADEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while WRRZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BADEF($31M) has a higher market cap than WRRZF($4.43M). WRRZF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BADEF (-57.379). WRRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.66M vs. BADEF (-3.12M). BADEF has more cash in the bank: 2.32M vs. WRRZF (415K). BADEF (0) and WRRZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BADEFWRRZFBADEF / WRRZF
Capitalization31M4.43M700%
EBITDA-3.12M-1.66M188%
Gain YTD-57.3790.000-
P/E Ratio4.74N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.32M415K558%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WRRZF: Fundamental Ratings
WRRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BADEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BADEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BADEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BADEF and WRRZF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BADEF and WRRZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BADEF
1D Price
Change %
BADEF100%
+2.60%
WRRZF - BADEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HL - BADEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
NEWP - BADEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
PAAS - BADEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
EGO - BADEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More

WRRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRRZF and BADEF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRRZF and BADEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRRZF
1D Price
Change %
WRRZF100%
N/A
BADEF - WRRZF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
WVMDF - WRRZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
WTHVF - WRRZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
XXMMF - WRRZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XTGRF - WRRZF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More