BADFF
Price
$25.89
Change
+$1.03 (+4.14%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
885.54M
BCKIY
Price
$6.00
Change
-$0.42 (-6.54%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
Ad is loading...

BADFF vs BCKIY

Header iconBADFF vs BCKIY Comparison
Open Charts BADFF vs BCKIYBanner chart's image
BADGER INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS
Price$25.89
Change+$1.03 (+4.14%)
Volume$991
Capitalization885.54M
Babcock International Group
Price$6.00
Change-$0.42 (-6.54%)
Volume$281
Capitalization3.11B
BADFF vs BCKIY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BADFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCKIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BADFF vs. BCKIY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BADFF is a Hold and BCKIY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BADFF: $25.89 vs. BCKIY: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: BADFF and BCKIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BADFF: 88% vs. BCKIY: 26%
Market capitalization -- BADFF: $885.54M vs. BCKIY: $3.11B
BADFF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $885.54M. BCKIY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BADFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBCKIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BADFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BCKIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCKIY is a better buy in the long-term than BADFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BADFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCKIY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BADFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BCKIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BADFF is a better buy in the short-term than BCKIY.

Price Growth

BADFF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.12% price change this week, while BCKIY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCKIY($3.12B) has a higher market cap than BADFF($886M). BADFF has higher P/E ratio than BCKIY: BADFF (21.57) vs BCKIY (13.08). BADFF YTD gains are higher at: 4.827 vs. BCKIY (-1.961). BCKIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 429M vs. BADFF (153M). BCKIY has more cash in the bank: 619M vs. BADFF (5.09M). BADFF has less debt than BCKIY: BADFF (246M) vs BCKIY (993M). BCKIY has higher revenues than BADFF: BCKIY (4.62B) vs BADFF (731M).
BADFFBCKIYBADFF / BCKIY
Capitalization886M3.12B28%
EBITDA153M429M36%
Gain YTD4.827-1.961-246%
P/E Ratio21.5713.08165%
Revenue731M4.62B16%
Total Cash5.09M619M1%
Total Debt246M993M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BADFF vs BCKIY: Fundamental Ratings
BADFF
BCKIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5326
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCKIY's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BADFF (74). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to BADFF’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BADFF (100). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to BADFF’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BADFF (53). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to BADFF’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BADFF (76). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to BADFF’s over the last 12 months.

BADFF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BCKIY (100). This means that BADFF’s stock grew similarly to BCKIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BADFFBCKIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BADFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCKIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLASX38.850.40
+1.04%
Selected American Shares S
FCIGX34.620.20
+0.58%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth I
TDFAX8.200.04
+0.49%
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc A
SNWRX63.610.29
+0.46%
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value R6
PSGKX22.03N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr K

BADFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BADFF and GKTRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BADFF and GKTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BADFF
1D Price
Change %
BADFF100%
N/A
GKTRF - BADFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TPC - BADFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
BIRDF - BADFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
BCKIY - BADFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.54%
BFLBY - BADFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More