BAFN
Price
$13.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
FMBH
Price
$39.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAFN vs FMBH

Header iconBAFN vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs FMBHBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$13.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.93K
CapitalizationN/A
First Mid Bancshares
Price$39.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$72K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BAFN vs FMBH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BAFN vs. FMBH commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and FMBH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BAFN: $13.95 vs. FMBH: $39.66)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 251% vs. FMBH: 105%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $53.23M vs. FMBH: $759.93M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.23M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $759.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the long-term than BAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2023.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($760M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($53.2M). BAFN has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: BAFN (10.74) vs FMBH (10.10). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 16.842 vs. BAFN (9.015). FMBH has more cash in the bank: 16.1M vs. BAFN (4.5M). BAFN has less debt than FMBH: BAFN (11.3M) vs FMBH (409M). FMBH has higher revenues than BAFN: FMBH (275M) vs BAFN (73.7M).
BAFNFMBHBAFN / FMBH
Capitalization53.2M760M7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.01516.84254%
P/E Ratio10.7410.10106%
Revenue73.7M275M27%
Total Cash4.5M16.1M28%
Total Debt11.3M409M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEIX17.100.14
+0.83%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Instl
DASCX19.690.14
+0.72%
Dean Small Cap Value
IFPUX21.860.01
+0.05%
Independent Franchise Partners US Equity
TGREX13.35N/A
N/A
TCW Global Real Estate I
FIADX51.13-0.33
-0.64%
Fidelity Advisor International Discv I

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and ALRS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and ALRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
+3.64%
ALRS - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
COLB - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
FMBH - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-0.33%
TMP - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
PFC - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
FRME - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
THFF - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
BY - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
More