Ad is loading...
BAFWX vs RGACX
BAFWX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs RGACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$49.69
Change-$1.79 (-3.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$67.33
Change-$2.51 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
BAFWX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. RGACX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. BAFWX (8.77B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: RGACX (0.08) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAFWX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BAFWX (0.61). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: RGACX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.66 vs. BAFWX (-3.90). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 86.34 vs. RGACX (47.01).
| BAFWX | RGACX | BAFWX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.94 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.94 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.587 | -2.987 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.77B | 287B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.90 | 2.66 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.98 | 21.08 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.34 | 47.01 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 236.51 | 63.74 | 371% |