Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FHLKX
BAICX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FHLKX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.48B
Fidelity Health Savings K
Price$10.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.34M
BAICX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FHLKX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Buy and FHLKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FHLKX (64.3M). BAICX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BAICX (5.66) vs FHLKX (2.87). BAICX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BAICX (17 years) vs FHLKX (5 years). BAICX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.39). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLKX (28.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FHLKX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. BAICX (9.58). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 25.83 vs. FHLKX (16.73).
| BAICX | FHLKX | BAICX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.39 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.39 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.095 | 7.257 | 98% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 64.3M | 16,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.66 | 2.87 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 10.12 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.63 | 19.01 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.83 | 16.73 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement