Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FHLSX
BAICX vs FHLSX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FHLSX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.41B
Fidelity Health Savings
Price$10.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.57M
BAICX vs FHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FHLSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Buy and FHLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. FHLSX (62.6M). BAICX pays higher dividends than FHLSX: BAICX (5.74) vs FHLSX (2.76). BAICX was incepted earlier than FHLSX: BAICX (17 years) vs FHLSX (5 years). BAICX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.49). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLSX (28.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FHLSX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. FHLSX (8.30). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 28.54 vs. FHLSX (19.38).
| BAICX | FHLSX | BAICX / FHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.49 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.49 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 4.938 | 105% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 62.6M | 16,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 2.76 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 8.30 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.58 | 22.37 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.54 | 19.38 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement